» Resources » What’s the difference between scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions? Energy & Carbon What’s the difference between scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions? In order for organisations to reach their net zero targets, a carbon strategy should be at the forefront of their minds. As part of that carbon strategy, it’s crucial that organisations, both SMEs and global corporates, are accurately measuring and managing their carbon emissions. For organisations to be able to measure their carbon footprint, they need to be able to calculate the greenhouse gas emissions that they’re responsible for. To do this, organisations must collect their operational data and use official multipliers (known as conversion factors) to translate those into carbon emissions. Organisations should, at minimum, cover their carbon scope 1 and 2 emissions, and also include their scope 3 emissions data where possible. It can be confusing at first to keep track of which emissions belong to which scope, so allow us to help and explain: Scope 1 emissions correspond to the direct emissions you have produced from owned and controlled sources. For example, if your organisation has a vehicle fleet, any diesel or petrol consumed by those vehicles generates emissions that come out of the exhaust pipes. Those are therefore emissions that the organisation is directly generating and responsible for. Scope 2 emissions are defined as indirect emissions from the consumption of electricity, steam, heating and cooling. Scope 3 emissions are all other indirect emissions. This can range from the carbon embodied in the materials you purchase through to emissions associated with the processing of the waste you have generated. For most organisations, scope 3 emissions will be the largest contributor to their footprint. Need a measurement tool for tracking your organisations’ carbon emissions? Register for a free Carbon Calculator account. Book a free discovery call with our sustainability reporting experts to explore how your organisation can reduce and measure its emissions Charles Naud Apr 1, 2022 Share: Related Articles June 2025 Blog The Hidden Roadblocks to Sustainable Labs and How to Overcome Them Mellita D'Silva June 2025 Blog The Hidden Roadblocks to Sustainable Labs and How to Overcome Them If I was given £1 for every time I heard the word autoclaves when engaging with the Higher Education sector to support them on sustainable procurement, I would be a millionaire by now. When we think about sustainable laboratories functioning and their efficiency, water use and its ethical disposal play an important part. And this […] Keagan Allin June 2025 Blog Comparing ISO 20400:2017 with the COâ‚‚ Performance Ladder  Sarah Chatfield June 2025 Blog Comparing ISO 20400:2017 with the COâ‚‚ Performance Ladder  ISO 20400:2017 and the COâ‚‚ Performance Ladder (the Ladder) are two influential frameworks for embedding sustainability in procurement. While one provides strategic guidance, the other serves as both a procurement instrument and a certifiable COâ‚‚ management system, making them highly complementary. This article explores how these frameworks intersect and how organisations can benefit from applying […] Keagan Allin June 2025 Blog Procurement at the Crossroads: Risk, Resilience, and Sustainability in Practice Vaishali Baid June 2025 Blog Procurement at the Crossroads: Risk, Resilience, and Sustainability in Practice When stepping into the world of procurement, it’s easy to believe that success hinges primarily on cost savings and timely delivery. But today, the landscape has changed -dramatically. In a fast-moving global market, growing investor pressure, geopolitical disruptions, and unpredictable supply chains have fundamentally reshaped how procurement operates. Through work with a range of clients, […] Keagan Allin