Science Based Targets (SBT) is on a mission to provide companies with a clearly defined path to reduce emissions in line with the Paris Agreement goals. Over 4,000 businesses around the world are already working on decarbonization strategies to dramatically reduce their carbon emissions, in response to the climate emergency. Buildings and Construction are the next candidates to go under the SBT microscope, with dedicated decarbonization pathways ready to be shared, tested, and scaled up.
Carbon Reduction Targets are important, and what can be measured, can be improved. The Supply Chain Sustainability School’s Climate Action Group and Carbon Calculator exist to support frameworks such as SBTi, to simplify data gathering, speed up analysis and automatically generate actionable insights.
In this blog we’ll explore both the SBTi Framework and the new Sectoral Guidance Note for Buildings and Construction – Science Based Targets, and how our upcoming Lower Carbon Buildings: Leading Beyond Walls virtual conference on 27th July links to this.
The SBTi is a partnership between CDP, the United Nations Global Compact, World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF).
Buildings account for 37% of today’s global CO2 emissions when both operational emissions and embodied emissions of materials are taken into account.
Of this, around 3 Gt CO2e are direct emissions; a further 9.8 Gt CO2e are indirect emissions from electricity and heat consumption; and a further 3.5 Gt CO2e from materials.
Floor area is set to grow approximately 75% over 2020-2050, meaning CO2 emissions will rise dramatically if no decarbonization efforts are made in the sector.
Science Based Targets already publish a set of sector specific decarbonization pathways to help sectors/organizations (globally) develop and set plausible targets that align with the Paris Agreement (1.5 Deg C).
A notable exclusion from the scope of intended users of this guidance are upstream manufacturing entities such as raw material producers (e.g. cement and steel) and intermediate product processors and transporters. While their products are intrinsic to the buildings sector, and are involved in setting embodied emission targets, these entities are beyond the scope of the buildings sector guidance. It is recommended to seek target-setting guidance from the sector-agnostic Net-Zero Standard or from sector-specific guidance documents where relevant, such as Steel and Cement mentioned earlier.
Here are some carbon emission sources that can be taken into account when applying the SDA framework to Buildings design and construction – which SBT believe will simplify the task of carbon reduction across the building value chain:
Example 1: Production
Production refers to the stage in which the building materials and components are manufactured and processed. This phase includes the extraction and processing of raw materials, and the fabrication and packaging of buildings products and materials.
Common emission sources:
Example 2: Construction
The process of building a structure, which involves the planning, design, procurement, transport of materials to the site, and building of the structure. It encompasses all activities related to the creation of a building, from the initial concept and design to the practical completion of the building.
Common emission sources:
Example 3: Use
A building’s operational life phase. During this period, the building is ready for use, regardless of whether it is continuously occupied.
Example 4: Retrofit
The introduction of new materials, products and technologies into an existing building to reduce the energy needed to occupy that building. Retrofitting and deep energy renovation are increasingly deemed as pivotal actions in the building sector’s decarbonization.
Example 5: End of Life
The dismantling, destroying, wrecking, or removal of buildings or structures.
The availability of a dedicated SBT Guidance Note for Buildings and Construction has been on the cards for a few years. In parallel to this, the UK Government has also worked hard to establish new Regulations and Standards for Buildings, both in domestics and industrial settings.
Both approaches have been made with robust industry and stakeholder engagement to ensure alignment, fit and value – equating to a set of objectives and key results (OKRs) for all participants of the value chain to commit too.
Be it on low-carbon design, switching to renewable sources of electricity, or installation of heat-pumps, we are already witnessing the ways that new and existing buildings can cut energy and carbon, making it exponentially easier for everyone to tap into good practice and bring consistency to an extremely complex problem.
To illustrate this; the UK’s legally-binding climate change targets will not be met without the near-complete elimination of greenhouse gas emissions from UK buildings. Emission reductions from the UK’s 29 million homes have stalled, while energy use in homes – which accounts for 14% of total UK emissions – increased between 2016 and 2017.
Efforts to adapt the UK’s housing stock to the impacts of the changing climate: for higher average temperatures, flooding and water scarcity, are lagging far behind what is needed to keep us safe and comfortable, even as these climate change risks grow.
Recent recommendations made by the UK Gov Committee on Climate Change suggest that action is needed in the following five areas:
If your business is involved with the design, construction or management of buildings, you’ll probably recognize some of the above, and already working on specific areas of improvement.
If you would like to know more about Lower Carbon Buildings, why not join us for our Lower Carbon Buildings virtual conference on the 27th July to hear from industry leaders on how they are tackling climate change, new technologies, and ways of working that can illuminate the way on your own decarbonization journey.
If you’re in need of decarbonisation and carbon reduction services, get in touch with me today.
This was posted in Energy & Carbon
There is now a growing and improving understanding of the climate crisis, however, alongside this there's the increasing risk of climate fatigue, Head of Climate Dr. James Cadman explores how we can stay engaged and fight against it.Read Article
In light of COP28 UAE, we asked our subject matter experts to share their perspectives on the key issues facing the planet and what actions are needed.Read Article